AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
G.S.Sistani, J
This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceeding with respect
to land of petitioners comprised in Khasra nos.52//19 (2-8) and 74//13/1 (1-12) admeasuring 4 bighas, situated in the revenue estate of village Karala,
New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “subject landâ€) stands lapsed in view of section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency
in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “2013 Actâ€) as neither possession of the subject land
has been taken nor compensation has been tendered to the petitioners.
The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition are that in this case a notification under section 4 read with section 17(1) & (4) of
the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (“the Act†in short) was issued on 21.03.2003 and a declaration under section 6 of the Act was made on
19.03.2004. Thereafter, an award bearing no.22/2005-06 was passed on 02.01.2006.
It is contended by the counsel for the petitioners that the case of the petitioners is fully covered by the provisions of section 24(2) of the 2013 Act
as both the conditions viz. neither the possession has been taken nor the compensation has been paid. It is contended that the counter affidavit filed by
LAC confirms that neither physical possession of the subject land has been taken nor compensation has been tendered to the petitioners.
Counsel for the LAC relies on para 4 of the counter affidavit, which is reproduced below :
“4. That it is submitted that the lands of village Karala were notified vide Notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
dated 21.3.2003 which was followed by the Notification under section 6 of the Act dated 19.3.2004. The Award was also passed vide Award
No.22/2005-06 dated 02.01.2006 however neither the possession of the subject lands falling in khasra number 52//19 min (2-8) and
74//13/1 (1-12) could be taken nor the compensation be paid.â€
Reading of the counter affidavit filed by the LAC makes it clear that neither physical possession of the subject land has been taken nor
compensation has been tendered to the petitioners. No counter affidavit has been filed by DDA. Even otherwise, we find that since the year 2006
when the award was rendered, till date, the actual physical possession of the subject land has not been taken. Since, neither the possession of the
subject land has been taken nor compensation has been tendered to the petitioners, the writ petition is allowed. It is declared that the acquisition
proceedings with respect to the subject land stand lapsed.
The writ petition is disposed of.
CM APPL 36939/2017 (stay)
The application stands disposed of in view of order passed in the writ petition.