High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashok Kumar vs State

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 25 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 RAJ CK 0537

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 420, 467, 468 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2373 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 259 words

This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.308/2005, Police Station

Jawahar Nagar, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 120-B of IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that it is a

fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Mamraj, in connection with

F.I.R. No.308/2005, Police Station Jawahar Nagar, District Sri Ganganagar, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to

the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

(I) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.