AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 134 wordsDinesh Mehta, J
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that due compliance of the order, non-compliance whereof has been alleged, has been made.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
In view of the aforesaid and in view of the unconditional apology tendered by the respondents in the reply, this Court is not inclined to continue with the present contempt proceedings.
Notices of contempt served to the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are hereby discharged.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes, however, with a liberty to the petitioners to challenge order dated 19.06.2015.
Needless to observe that if any of the grievance of the petitioners still persists, they will be free to take appropriate proceedings including revival of the contempt petition.
