High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashok Rana vs Om Prakash & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 5 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0064

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 200 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 165 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Writ Court vide order dated 28.12.2020, passed in WPMS No. 2488 of 2020, had directed the Secretary of the concerned Department to take

decision on petitioner’s representation within six weeks.

2.

In this contempt petition, it is alleged that the order passed by Writ Court has not been complied with.

3.

A compliance affidavit has been filed Mr. Anand Bardhan, Additional Chief Secretary (Environment & Forest), Government of Uttarakhand. In

para 8 of the said compliance affidavit, it has been stated that petitioner’s representation has been decided on 29.06.2021, copy of which, is

enclosed as annexure No. 3 to the said compliance affidavit.

4.

Mr. B.M. Pingal, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the order of Writ Court stands complied with.

5.

In such view of the matter, contempt petition is closed. Notices issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged. However, petitioner shall be at

liberty to approach appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance, if any.