High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashwani Kumar vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 14 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0181

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438, 438(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 370, 406, 420 · Immigration Act, 1983 — Section 24
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 27470 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

29 paragraphs · 483 words

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J

Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing. Reply by way of affidavit dated 12.01.2021 of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kaithal has

been filed through e-mail, which is taken on record.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 90 dated 28.05.2020 registered under

Sections 406, 420 IPC and under Section 24 of the Immigration Act, 1983 (Section 370 IPC added later on) at Police Station Dhand, District Kaithal.

This Court, on 11.09.2020, passed the following order:

“Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 90 dated 28.05.2020

registered under Sections 406, 420 IPC and under Section 24 of the Immigration Act, 1983 (Section 370 IPC added later on) at Police

Station Dhand, District Kaithal.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was granted interim bail by the Sessions Court on 10.06.2020. Pursuant to the

said order, the petitioner made all efforts to join the investigation but he was not allowed to do so by the Investigating Officer. He, thus,

ultimately communicated the same to the concerned SHO vide letter dated 18.07.2020, but the same did also not yield any result.

Subsequently, vide order dated 31.08.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kaithal, the bail application of the petitioner

was dismissed on the ground that Section 370 IPC was added to/in the FIR after recording the supplementary statement of the complainant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the petitioner is not into the business of sending people abroad and is basically

running a Pesticides and Fertilizers agency. Moreover, the complainant went abroad and he had been apprehended while crossing the

Mexico border.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State and prays for time to file reply.

Adjourned to 14.01.2021.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the

satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and

shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.â€​

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 11.09.2020 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, relying upon the reply of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kaithal dated 12.01.2021 submits that the petitioner has joined the

investigation and is not required for any further investigation.

In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 11.09.2020 granting interim bail

to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.