High CourtsSingle Bench

Avtar Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0045

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suvir Sehgal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 — Section 16, 17 · Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1124 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 411 words

Suvir Sehgal J

The Court has been convened through video conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing official

respondents to get the dentenues, mentioned in para No.4 of the petition, released from the illegal detention of respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

A Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 32 of 2013, titled 'Murti versus The State of Punjab and others', has held as under:

“It may be mentioned here that the allegations of the appellant in the writ petition are that the alleged detenues mentioned in para No.3

of the writ petition who are working as labourers at the brick kiln of respondent Nos. 4 & 5 are being kept as bonded labours. There can

indeed be no doubt that if a labourer has been detained as bonded labour, it amounts to an offence under Sections 16 & 17 of the Bounded

Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976. We, however, clarify that the aforesaid observation does not mean that the allegations levelled by the

appellant have been accepted. Suffice it to observe that under the Act, the District Magistrate is under statutory obligation to hold a fact

finding enquiry as and when a complaint alleging violation of the provisions of Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976 is received. Since the

appellant in the instant case has specifically averred that the persons mentioned in para No.3 of the writ petition have been detained as

bonded labourers, we allow this appeal and setaside/ modify the order dated 9.1.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge to the extent that

the petitioner's writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Sangrur, to treat this writ petition as a complaint under

the 1976 Act and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receiving a certified copy of

this order alongwith a copy of the writ petition.â€​

Accordingly, this Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate, Taran Tarn to treat this petition as a complaint under the

Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt

of a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition.