High CourtsSingle Bench

Naresh vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 22 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0278

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suvir Sehgal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1827 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 403 words

Suvir Sehgal, J

The Court has been convened through video conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.

This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus seeking appointment of

Warrant Officer for the release of the detenues, mentioned in para No.4 of the petition, from the illegal detention of respondent Nos.4 to 6.

A Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 32 of 2013, titled 'Murti versus The State of Punjab and others', has held as under:

“It may be mentioned here that the allegations of the appellant in the writ petition are that the alleged detenues mentioned in para No.3 of the writ

petition who are working as labourers at the brick kiln of respondent Nos. 4 & 5 are being kept as bonded labours. There can indeed be no doubt that

if a labourer has been detained as bonded labour, it amounts to an offence under Sections 16 & 17 of the Bounded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976. We,

however, clarify that the aforesaid observation does not mean that the allegations levelled by the appellant have been accepted. Suffice it to observe

that under the Act, the District Magistrate is under statutory obligation to hold a fact finding enquiry as and when a complaint alleging violation of the

provisions of Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976 is received. Since the appellant in the instant case has specifically averred that the persons

mentioned in para No.3 of the writ petition have been detained as bonded labourers, we allow this appeal and setaside/ modify the order dated

9.1.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge to the extent that the petitioner's writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate,

Sangrur, to treat this writ petition as a complaint under the 1976 Act and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week

from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order alongwith a copy of the writ petition.â€​

Accordingly, this Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate, Jalandhar to treat this petition as a complaint under the

Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt

of a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition.