High CourtsSingle Bench

Avtar Singh @ Tari vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0068

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 — Section 4, 8 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 3764 Of 2021 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

32 paragraphs · 519 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

CRM-2934-2021

For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed and date of hearing is preponed from 26.04.2021 to today.

CRM stands disposed of.

CRM-2936-2021

For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed.

Annexure P-7 is taken on record and exemption sought is granted.

CRM stands disposed of.

CRM-M-3764-2021

Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail in FIR No.210 dated 05.11.2016 under Section 376 IPC and Sections 4 & 8 of POCSO Act,

registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Kapurthala.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per allegations in the FIR, registered at the instance of victim ‘J’ (name not disclosed), on

04.11.2016 at about 11.45 pm, when she came out of her house for easing herself, two young persons were sitting, out of which one person caught

hold of her. One of them was petitioner Avtar Singh @ Tari and she could not identify another person. It is further stated that the petitioner committed

rape on her and when she raised voice, both the boys ran away from the spot. In the meantime, her maternal uncle and grandfather came at the spot.

She was taken to the hospital and the case was registered. It is further submitted that after registration of the case, statement of the victim was

recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., in which she has stated that “on that day I was rape but to darkness I could not identify him. There is no

pressure on me. If I get a chance then I can identify the accused persons. I do not want to say anything else.â€​

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the police, after conducting the investigation, submitted the untraced report on 16.03.2020, after

got verified from DSP, Sub Division Kapurthala.

A perusal of the untraced report shows that the police has relied upon the statement of victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. as well as

statement of her father Gurnam Singh, who is stated that her daughter has wrongly recorded the name of petitioner Avtar Singh @ Tari and

misunderstanding has been cleared and the untraced report was submitted.

Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the Illaqa Magistrate did not accept the untraced report, therefore, the petitioner was arrested in

the case on 12.12.2020 i.e. after about four years, as the FIR was registered on 05.11.2016.

Learned State counsel has filed the custody certificate in the Court today and could not dispute the factual position that at one point of time, the police

has submitted the untraced report, on the basis of statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. as well as statement of her father,

exonerating the petitioner, however, it is submitted that the victim was aged about 15 years.

Without commenting anything on merits of the case, considering the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this petition is

allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail subject to furnishing his bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa

Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, concerned.

Petition is disposed of.