High CourtsSingle Bench

Piara Singh vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 29 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0403

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 363, 366, 376, 506 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 4 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 3219 Of 2021 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 414 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail in FIR No.99 dated 25.08.2019 under Sections 363, 366, 376, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 4 of

POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Lohian, District Jalandhar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the order dated 13.07.2020 passed in CRM-M-11052-2020, vide which co-accused Taljit Singh was

granted the concession of regular bail. The operative part of the order reads as under: -

“...This Court is informed that the police completed the investigation in this case and filed a challan. Thereupon, the victim-girl was also examined

before the trial Court. Significantly, she retracted from the version set out in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C and virtually gave a

clean chit to the petitioner and the other accused. As the trial is already underway and the victim-girl has also been examined, this Court is of the

opinion that the petitioner would be entitled to grant of relief at this stage, subject to conditions.

The petition is accordingly allowed directing the release of the petitioner on regular bail in FIR No. 99 dated 25.08.2019 on the file of Police Station

Lohian, District Jalandhar, upon his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- along with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction

of the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate concerned. Further, the petitioner shall not cause any inducement, threat or promise to any person concerned with the

case.â€​

For the sake of brevity, facts of the case are not reproduced. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the statement of victim, who appeared

as PW2, wherein it is stated that both the accused i.e. petitioner Piara Singh and Taljit Singh have not made any physical relations with her and the

petitioner has also not performed marriage with her. This witness has even denied having made the complaint to the police and stated that her

signatures were obtained on blank papers.

Learned State counsel has filed the custody certificate dated 28.01.2021 in the Court today and has not disputed the factual position.

Without commenting anything on merits of the case, considering the aforesaid submissions and the fact that co-accused of the petitioner namely

Taljit Singh has already been granted the concession of regular bail, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail

subject to furnishing his bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, concerned.

Petition is disposed of.