AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 150 wordsAnoop Chitkara, J
The petitioner, who is working as Peon in Sub Treasury Bangana, District Una, H.P., has come up before this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to promote him from the date when his juniors were promoted with all consequential benefits.
Notice. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents.
Consequently, this petition is disposed of with a directions to the respondent/authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner, Annexure P-8, in accordance with law, within two months. It is made clear that in case the petitioner is still aggrieved with the outcome of the representation, he is at liberty to approach this Court again for redressal thereof. Pending application(s), if any, are closed.
