High CourtsSingle Bench

Baldev Singh vs State of Punjab & Ors

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 P&H CK 0069

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jaswant Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226, 227
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CWP No.1839 of 2014

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 309 words

JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL)

Petitioner retired as Clerk from the office of Municipal Council, Mansa has filed the present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution

seeking issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to treat the suspension period as duty period for all benefits of pay and

allowances and retiral benefits as per resolution no.359 dated 30.07.2012 passed by respondent no.4 and approved by respondent no.3 and further

prayer is for directing the respondents to pay the entire/balance retiral benefits to the petitioner on pay of Rs.19980/-amounting to Rs.9,10,699/- by

treating the suspension period as duty period as per resolution dated 30.07.2012 passed by the respondent no.4 and even implemented by respondent

no.3 but respondent no.3 had paid the retiral benefits on pay of Rs.18,960/- amounting to Rs.7,50,053 and thereby wrongly and illegally withheld the

arrears without any reason. Further prayer is made for release of full pay and allowances and all other consequential benefits of suspension period

from 5.9.1990 to 2.7.1997 as per the resolution dated 30.07.2012 passed by the Muncipal Council Mansa and approved by respondent no.3. Further

prayer is made for release of arrears of pension from 01.10.2012 to 31.08.2013 and committed value of pension amounting to Rs.5,90,419/- as

admitted by respondent no.3 and lastly prayer was made for payment of revised pensionary/retiral benefits after the revision of the pay scales w.e.f.

01.01.2006

At the time of hearing, learned Counsel for the respondent no.4 submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous since the necessary

benefits as prayed for in the petition have been granted to the petitioner.

Learned Proxy Counsel for the petitioner conceded to the aforesaid submission made on behalf of respondent no.4.

In view of the aforesaid agreed stand, present writ petition is hereby dismissed as infructous as the necessary benefits have been granted to the

petitioner.