High CourtsSingle Bench

Balwant Singh vs State of Punjab and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 13 December 2010 · Citation: (2010) 12 P&H CK 0281

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajai Lamba, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226, 227
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 17035 of 2010
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 104 words

Ajai Lamba, J.—This civil writ petition has beenfiled under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ in thenature of mandamus directing the Respondents to release retiral benefits of the Petitioner viz. pension, commutation of pension, gratuity, leave encashment, General Provident Fund and Group Insurance Scheme.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner contends that the matter has been rendered in fructuous, in so much as, retiral benefits have been released and therefore, cause of action does not survive.

3.

The petition is disposed of as having been rendered in fructuous on the statement of learned Counsel for the Petitioner.