High CourtsDivision Bench

Balvir Chand vs State of Punjab and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 28 June 2013 · Citation: (2013) 06 P&H CK 0006

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satish Kumar Mittal, J · Rajiv Narain Raina, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226, 227
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 13629 of 2013
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 195 words

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.—The petitioner, who is a resident of village Chaura, Block and Tehsil Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur, has filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to respondent No. 2 to accept his nomination papers for contesting the election for the post of Sarpanch of the village. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we are not inclined to entertain this petition, as the election process has already started. The elections are scheduled to be held on July 03, 2013. The petitioner has an effective alternative remedy to challenge the election of the successful candidate on the aforesaid ground. Thus, in view of these facts and the law laid down by the Hon''ble Supreme Court in N.P. Ponnuswami Vs. Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency and Others, ; Boddula Krishnaiah and another Vs. State Election Commissioner, A.P. and others, ; and Election Commission of India Through Secretary Vs. Ashok Kumar and Others, , at this stage, this petition cannot be entertained.

2.

Dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy of filing the election petition challenging the election of the successful candidate on the aforesaid ground.