High CourtsDivision Bench

Rajinder Pal Singh and Another vs State of Punjab and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 2 July 2013 · Citation: (2013) 07 P&H CK 0517

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satish Kumar Mittal, J · Mahavir S. Chauhan, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 13763 of 2013

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 211 words

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.—The petitioners, who are residents of villages Kothe Mehlad, Block Kotkapura, District Faridkot, have filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 24.6.2013 Annexure P1 whereby their nomination papers for the post of Sarpanch/Panch of the said Gram Panchayats have been rejected. It is the case of the petitioners that their nomination papers have been wrongly rejected by the Returning Officer.

2.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners we are not inclined to entertain this petition, as the election process has already started. The elections are scheduled to be held on July 03, 2013. The petitioners have an effective alternative remedy to challenge the election of the successful candidate on the aforesaid ground. Thus, in view of these facts and the law laid down by the Hon''ble Supreme Court in N.P. Ponnuswami Vs. Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency and Others, Boddula Krishnaiah and another Vs. State Election Commissioner, A.P. and others, and Election Commission of India Through Secretary Vs. Ashok Kumar and Others, , at this stage, this petition cannot be entertained. Dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail the alternative remedy of filing the election petition challenging the election of the successful candidate on the aforesaid ground.