High CourtsDIVISION BENCH

Bangalore Development Authority Represented by its Commissioner, & Anr. vs State of Karnataka By its Chief Secretary, & Anr.

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 28 April 2017 · Citation: (2017) 04 KAR CK 0136

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P.S.Dinesh Kumar
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
252 of 2017 (LA-BDA) AND WRIT APPEAL NOS 2270-2271 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 156 words
1.

The appeals are barred by limitation. The delay is of 445 days.

2.

As prayed for by Mr.G.S.Kannur, learned advocate appearing for the appellants, the appeals are taken up for preliminary hearing.

3.

The writ petitioner assailed a notification dated December 30, 2008, proposing to acquire the land for formation of a layout. The preliminary notification was issued on December 30, 2008. Thereafter, neither the final notification was issued nor possession was taken. Consequently, the Hon''ble Single Judge held that as within the reasonable time, no further action was taken, the proposal for acquisition got lapsed.

4.

We do not find any merit in the appeals.

5.

The application for condonation of delay in filing the appeals is dismissed. Consequently, the appeals are, also dismissed.

6.

In view of the dismissal of the appeals, the pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and is, also, dismissed.

7.

We make no order as to costs.