High CourtsDIVISION BENCH

The Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority, & Anr. vs State of Karnataka Represented by its Principal Secretary Urban Development, & Ors.

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 28 March 2017 · Citation: (2017) 03 KAR CK 0288

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P.S.Dinesh Kumar
CASE NUMBER
4571 of 2016 (LA-BDA) AND WRIT APPEAL NO 1746 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 133 words
1.

The appeals are barred by limitation. As the matters involve the Bengaluru Development Authority and as requested by Mr.G.S.Kannur, learned advocate appearing for the appellants, we take up the appeals for consideration.

2.

Certain land was sought to be acquired by the Bengaluru Development Authority in the year 1977. Till today, no award was passed nor the possession was taken. The Hon''ble Single Judge, in our view, rightly held that the acquisition stood lapsed.

3.

We do not find any merit in the appeals.

4.

The application for condonation of delay in filing the appeals is dismissed. Consequently, the appeals are, also, dismissed.

5.

In view of dismissal of the appeals, the pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and is, also, dismissed.

6.

We make no order as to costs.