High CourtsDivision Bench

Beli Ram vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 16 March 2011 · Citation: (2011) 03 SHI CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · V.K. Ahuja, J
CASE NUMBER
C.W.P. No. 1233 of 2011
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 228 words

Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

A) That the Respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the service of the Petitioner w.e.f. 1.1.1991 or in alternative from 1.1.1994(as per the scheme framed in Mool Raj Upadhayay v. State of H.P. by the Hon''ble Apex Court) when he is completing more than 10 years of service with all consequential benefits.

B) That the Respondents may be directed to allow the Petitioner to serve till the age of 60 years.

2.

According to the Petitioner, going by the decision of the Apex Court in P.V. Papanna and others Vs. K. Padmanabhaiah, he should have been regularized in service on completion of 10 years, in the year 1994. However, he was granted such regularization only in the year 2002. In case the Petitioner is regularized prior to 10.5.2001, he is also entitled to continue till he attains the age of 60 years. The Petitioner has submitted Annexure P-4, representation, before the second Respondent. There will be a direction to the second Respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law on or before 25th May, 2011. The Petitioner will immediately produce a copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition before the second Respondent.

3.

The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.