High CourtsSingle Bench

Benup Dhakal vs State Of Sikkim And Others

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 28 November 2022 · Citation: (2022) 11 SIK CK 0063

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 53 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 112 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

The Vakalatnama of Ms. Laxmi Chakraborty, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner stands withdrawn in terms of her submission made on 17-11-2022.

Petitioner is present in person. He submits that in view of the settlement arrived at with the State-Respondents Nos. 1 to 6 and Respondent No.7, in terms of which he has received monetary compensation, he does not seek to pursue the instant matter and seeks to withdraw the Writ Petition.

Not opposed by other parties.

Considered.

In view of the submissions, put forth by the Petitioner, nothing remains for adjudication.

WP(C) No.53 of 2018 stands disposed of as withdrawn.

Pending Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.