AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
8 paragraphs · 127 wordsMeenakshi Madan Rai, J
Learned Senior Counsel for Respondent No.5 submits that he is agreeable to an assessment to be made by the concerned authority with regard to the compensation claimed by the Petitioners.
Learned Additional Advocate General for Respondents No.1 to 4 undertakes to take necessary steps in this regard to compute the assessment in tandem with the concerned District Authority.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioners has no objection to the submissions put forth by Learned Senior Counsel for Respondent No.5 and Learned Additional Advocate General for Respondents No.1 to 4.
Considered.
In view of the submissions put forth by Learned Counsel for the parties, nothing further remains for adjudication.
W.P.(C) No.23 of 2018 stands disposed of accordingly.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.