High CourtsSingle Bench

Bhag Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 August 2005 · Citation: (2005) 08 P&H CK 0101

HON’BLE JUDGES
Uma Nath Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 279
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 1263 of 2005
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 155 words

Uma Nath Singh, J.—Admit.

2.

Learned Counsel submitted that the accused-Petitioner stands convicted by concurrent findings under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC and has been awarded six months RI on the first count and one year RI with a fine of Rs. 500/- on the second count. Learned Counsel further submitted that the fine amounts have already been deposited and the Petitioner is lodged in jail for the past one month.

3.

Thus, taking into account totality of circumstances and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, prayer for suspension of jail sentences is allowed and it is directed that during pendency of this revision, jail sentence of Bhag Singh son of Jailmal Singh shall remain suspended. He shall be released on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with two solvent sureties in the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rupnager.