AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 147 wordsUma Nath Singh, J.—Admit.
Learned Counsel submitted that the accused-Petitioner stands convicted by concurrent findings under Sections 353 and 506 IPC and has been awarded six months RI with a fine of Rs. 500/- on both counts. Learned Counsel further submitted that the fine amounts have already been deposited and the Petitioner is lodged in jail for the past one month and seven days.
Thus, taking into account totality of circumstances and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, prayer for suspension of jail sentences is allowed and it is directed that during pendency of this revision, jail sentence Vasudev son of Karam Chand shall remain suspended. He shall be released on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/-. With two solvent sureties in the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana.