High CourtsDivision Bench

Bhime Ram vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 12 August 2011 · Citation: (2011) 08 SHI CK 0076

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · V.K. Ahuja, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 6104 of 2011
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 212 words

Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

(i) A writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the Respondents to allow the benefit of regular appointment in favour of the Petitioner w.e.f. 20.4.1993 i.e. the date of award of J.B.T. Condensed Course Certificate alongwith consequential benefits of increments and seniority.

(ii) That the Respondents may also be directed to allow and pay honorarium/stipend in favour of the Petitioner for the period of training undergone by the Petitioner for award of J.B.T. Condensed Course Certificate as allowed to similarly situated persons in the State of Himachal Pradesh.

2.

It is seen that the Petitioner has made Annexure P-2 representation and the same is pending before the second Respondent. There will be a direction to the second Respondent/competent authority to look into the representation Annexure P-2 and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the Petitioner. In case the Petitioner requests for an opportunity of hearing, the same shall also be granted.

3.

With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any.