High CourtsSingle Bench

Bijendra Kumar vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 21 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 UK CK 0074

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1141 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 183 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

According to the petitioner, he had applied for mining lease over his agricultural land. Since his application has not been considered by the

Competent Authority, therefore, petitioner has approached this Court seeking following relief:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to take a decision on application of petitioner seeking

mining lease on NIZI NAP BHUMI as application along with deposit slip has been applied on 10.06.2020 (Contained as Annexure no. 3 to this writ

petition)

2.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, specially as regards maintainability of such application for mining lease in respect of

agricultural land, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate, Haridwar to consider petitioner’s application and take

appropriate decision, strictly in accordance with Government Policy and also the relevant Statutory provisions, including provisions contained in U.P.

Zamidari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, as early as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy

of this order.