High CourtsSingle Bench

Surendra Singh & Others vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 17 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 UK CK 0053

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1033 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 345 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

2.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-

I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.2 not to give mining license to the

respondent no.5 for carrying out mining operation in respect of the areas Kosarijar and Chutgarh of the village Khuldaurhi, District Bageshwar for

which the concerned villagers, including the petitioners, have not given NOC to the respondent no.5;

II. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the respondent no.2 from according license to the respondent no.5 for carrying out mining

operation in respect of the areas Kosarijar and Chutgarh of the village Khuldaurhi, District Bageshwar, since the villagers including the petitioner have

objection to the mining operations in said area and the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) has not been obtained by the respondent no.5 for the

areas Kosarijar and Chutgarh of the village Khuldauhi, District Bageshwar;

III. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing and commanding the respondent no.2 to give mining lease only with respect area Dhamdeval

of the village Khuldauhi, District Bageshwar, strictly in terms of the No Objection Certificate (NOC) executed by the villagers including the

petitioners;

3.

After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press the writ petition on merits and the writ petition

be disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate to look into the matter and take appropriate decision.

4.

Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate, Bageshwar, by making a joint

representation. If such a representation is made within one week from today, District Magistrate, Bageshwar shall examine the matter and pass

appropriate order, in accordance with law, within six weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. It goes

without saying that while taking decision, District Magistrate shall hear all the stakeholders, including respondent no.5.