CourtKutchehry.com
Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Birendra Prasad Chaubey vs Union Of India And Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 12 July 2024 · Citation: (2024) 07 CAT CK 0022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Om Prakash VII, Member (J) · Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Delay Condonation Application No. 772 Of 2024, Civil Miscellaneous Restoration Application No. 773 Of 2024 In Original Application No. 139 Of 2017
Download PDFAsk AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 131 words

Om Prakash -VII, Member (J)

1.

None present for the applicant even in the revised call. Shri D.P Singh, learned counsel for the respondents is present.

2.

There is no request on behalf of the applicant’s counsel for adjournment. It is seen that the MA No. 773/2024 for restoration of OA, which was dismissed in default on 01.03.2023 is pending since long and today also none appeared on behalf of the applicant to press these MAs. It is quite apparent that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the matter.

3.

Accordingly, the MA No. 772/2024 for delay condonation application in filing the restoration application and MA No. 773/2024 for restoration of OA are dismissed in default and for want of prosecution. No costs. All associated MAs are disposed of accordingly.