Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Brij Kishore vs Vinod Kumar Yadav

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 7 April 2021 · Citation: (2021) 04 CAT CK 0061

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Pradeep Kumar, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 14 Of 2020 In Original Application No. 2450 Of 2014, Miscellaneous Application No. 980 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 156 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

MA 980/2021

This Application is filed with a prayer to pre-pone the date of hearing of the OA. For the reasons stated therein, the same is allowed and the OA is

taken up for hearing today itself.

CP No. 14/2020

1.

This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents did not implement the order dated 28.08.2O18 in OA No.2450 /2014. The direction in the

OA was to pass orders on the representation of the applicant dated 23.01.2013 within a period of three months from the date of the order.

2.

In compliance thereof, the respondents have passed an order dated 26.11.2018. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the order dated

26.11.2018 has not been furnished to him. Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to furnish the order today itself.

3.

We, therefore, close the contempt case, leaving it open to the applicant to pursue the remedy vis-a-vis order dated 26.11.2O18.