High CourtsSingle Bench

Chand Mohd & Anr vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 1 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0048

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 342, 382
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous CaseNo.2514 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 252 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

1.

Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 399/2010 under Sections 382/342/323/34 IPC, Police Station Amar Colony.Â

2.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they had forcefully taken the complainant to their shop and snatched Rs.1,00,000/- from his pocket and

when the same was demanded, the complainant was assaulted. Â

3.

Parties were referred to mediation and they have settled their disputes before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts on 14.07.2016.

4.

Respondent No.2 is present in Court in person, identified by the Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2 has placed on record photocopy of his

Aadhar Card.  He confirms that he has settled with the petitioners and does not wish to prosecute the FIR any further and has no objection to the

quashing of the FIR.Â

5.

In view of the fact that the respondent No.2 has settled his disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to prosecute the complaint any further,

continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end

and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the

consequent proceedings emanating there from.Â

6.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 399/2010 under Sections 382/342/323/34 IPC, Police Station Amar Colony and the

consequent proceedings arising therefrom are, accordingly, quashed.Â

7.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.Â