High CourtsSingle Bench

Chandershekhar vs State

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 August 2014 · Citation: (2015) 1 JCC 9

HON’BLE JUDGES
Indermeet Kaur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 304-A
CASE NUMBER
Crl. Rev. No. 311 of 2014
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 201 words

Indermeet Kaur, J.

Crl. M. (B) No. 1050/2014

1.

Nominal roll of the petitioner reflects that as on 18.08.2014, he has been incarcerated for 3 months and 13 days besides remissions earned of 19 days for his conviction under Section 304-A of the IPC for which he has been sentenced to undergo SI for 18 months along with tine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI. 2 months. It is stated that the fine has since been paid. Keeping in view the fact that the revision petition is not likely to be heard in near future and also the period of incarceration already suffered by the petitioner, the substantive sentence of the petitioner is suspended; he be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of like amount subject to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Jail Superintendent with the condition that he shall appear before the revisional Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing. This order is passed subject to the verification of deposit of fine.

2.

Application disposed off.

Order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.