AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
27 paragraphs · 532 wordsBhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
This is to consider an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)
pending the determination of the Revision Petition under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C.
The learned Trial Judge convicted the Applicant under Section 354-A(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentenced him to undergo
simple imprisonment for a period of 2 years and fine of Rs.5000/- vide judgment and order both dated 30.04.2018. The learned Sessions Judge vide
impugned judgment dated 24.10.2018 declined to interfere with the judgment of the learned Trial Judge but modified the provision of law clarifying that
the conviction ought to have been under Section 354â€"A(1) (i) & (iv) IPC.
The Applicant was taken into custody on 24.10.2018 and has been lodged at the State Central Prison, Rongyek, East Sikkim ever since.
Heard Mr. N. Rai, learned Senior Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Karma Thinlay Namgyal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State-
Respondent. Whilst Mr. N. Rai would seek suspension of sentence and grant of bail on the grounds urged in the application Mr. Karma Thinlay
Namgyal would submit that this was a case in which the judgment of the Trial Court has been confirmed by the Sessions Court as well and therefore
bail ought not to be granted.
It is submitted on behalf of the Applicant that he is a young man of 28 years of age hailing from a respectable family presently posted as Branch
Manager in Syndicate Bank in U.P. and is a permanent resident of Benipatti, Madhubani, Bihar. The Applicant is stated to be the earning member of
his family comprising of his old dependent parents. It is urged that the Applicant was on police bail during investigation and thereafter on Court bail
during trial as also during appeal proceedings and he has never misused/violated any of the terms and conditions mentioned in the bail orders. It is also
urged that Section 354â€"A(1) (i) & (iv) IPC is a bailable offence.
The order dated 09.02.2018 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, South Sikkim at Namchi reflects that the Applicant has been released
on bail upon furnishing personal bond and surety bond of Rs.50,000/- each. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate had also released the Applicant on
bail upon furnishing personal bond and surety bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each vide order dated 30.04.2018 to allow the Applicant to prefer an appeal before
the Sessions Court.
This Court has admitted the Revision Petition and called for the lower Court records for hearing. In view of the aforesaid, pending hearing of the
present Revision Petition, the Applicant shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, South Sikkim at Namchi on a
personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount. The Applicant shall personally attend all dates of hearing in the present
proceedings. The Applicant as well as the sureties shall also furnish their personal and official addresses, e-mail addresses, telephone and mobile
numbers and if there is any change in the same notify the changes forthwith.
The application stands disposed.
