High CourtsSingle Bench

Chandra Kishore Naithani vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 8 December 2021 · Citation: (2021) 12 UK CK 0117

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2432 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 132 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

According to the petitioner, he has made representation to Assistant Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits on 29.07.2021, but no decision thereupon has been taken.

2.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to respondent no. 3 to take decision on the said representation.

3.

Learned counsels appearing for the respondents have no objection if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 3 to take decision in the matter.

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Assistant Registrar (respondent no. 3) to decide petitioner's representation, in accordance with law, within ten weeks from today.

5.

It goes without saying that before taking any decision, Registrar shall hear all the stakeholders, including respondent no. 4.