High CourtsSingle Bench

Cipla Limited vs Union Of India & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 26 March 2024 · Citation: (2024) 03 SIK CK 0080

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C). No. 38 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 122 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 5 and 6 submits that she would be filing counter-affidavit on behalf of the respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 during the course of the day as the petitioner have already been served. Permitted. If the counter affidavit is filed by the respondent nos. 4 to 6, two weeks thereafter, to the petitioner to file rejoinder if required.

2.

The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India submits that no counter-affidavit would be required on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 and 3. The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 5 and 6 shall also ensure to serve the copies to the rest of the parties also.

3.

List on 16.04.2024.