High CourtsSingle Bench

Kishan Kumar Bhujel vs Union Of India & Ors

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 2 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 SIK CK 0352

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 67 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 113 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent nos.2 to 4 submits that although they have filed their counter affidavit, the same is in defect and may need some time to cure it. The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing for respondent no.1 submits that instructions were received only four days ago and therefore she seeks further time. In the circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant further two weeks time to respondent no.1. The respondent nos. 2 to 4 may also take steps to rectify the defects. On receipt of the counter affidavits the petitioner, may file rejoinder, within two weeks.

2.

List thereafter on 12.05.2026.