AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
32 paragraphs · 352 wordsBoth the petitioners are present in person and identified by their
counsel. They seek protection of their life and liberty by contending that
both of them having attained the age of majority, having married each other
against the wishes of their respective family members respondent Nos.3 to
5, and so seek appropriate protection from the authorities. They submitted a
representation (Annexure P-4) in this regard to the Senior Superintendent of
Police, Rupnagar on 19.07.2017, but are still apprehensive about their
security in view of the apparent inaction and alleged clout of their family
members-respondents.
Both of them do appear to have crossed the age of majority as
seen from the copies of documents filed and have married, each other in
support of which, photographs (Annexure P-3) have been placed on record.
For the aforesaid reasons, this appears to be a fit case for this
Court to invoke the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and in
view of the mandate contained in Article 21 of the Constitution of India to
protect the citizen''s right to life and liberty.
Thus the Senior Superintendent of Police, Rupnagar is directed
to consider the representation dated 19.07.2017 (Annexure P-4) and take
appropriate steps to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of
the petitioners.
It is nevertheless clarified that this order is issued only on the
premise that the petitioners have crossed the age of majority as seen from
the documents placed on record being their Aadhar Cards. The petitioners
have not produced on record a copy of their marriage certificate. However,
they have appended affidavits in support of their marriage and photographs
(Annexure P-3). This would not ipso facto amount to granting any seal of
approval on the legality of their marriage which essentially would come in
the domain of the concerned Matrimonial Courts. Further, they would not
be entitled for any protection against their arrest or continuance of any
criminal proceedings, if otherwise, found to be involved in commission of
any cognizable offence(s).
The petition is disposed off with the above direction.
