High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Daljit Kaur and another vs State of Punjab and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 21 July 2017 · Citation: (2017) 07 P&H CK 0007

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudip Ahluwalia
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=3998>Constitution of India</a>, <a href=3998-21>Article 21</a> - Amendment of the Schedule · <a href=3863>Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973</a>, <a href=3863-482>Section 482</a> - Saving of inherent powers of High Court
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
26225-2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

32 paragraphs · 352 words
1.

Both the petitioners are present in person and identified by their

counsel. They seek protection of their life and liberty by contending that

both of them having attained the age of majority, having married each other

against the wishes of their respective family members respondent Nos.3 to

5, and so seek appropriate protection from the authorities. They submitted a

representation (Annexure P-4) in this regard to the Senior Superintendent of

Police, Rupnagar on 19.07.2017, but are still apprehensive about their

security in view of the apparent inaction and alleged clout of their family

members-respondents.

2.

Both of them do appear to have crossed the age of majority as

seen from the copies of documents filed and have married, each other in

support of which, photographs (Annexure P-3) have been placed on record.

3.

For the aforesaid reasons, this appears to be a fit case for this

Court to invoke the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and in

view of the mandate contained in Article 21 of the Constitution of India to

protect the citizen''s right to life and liberty.

4.

Thus the Senior Superintendent of Police, Rupnagar is directed

to consider the representation dated 19.07.2017 (Annexure P-4) and take

appropriate steps to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of

the petitioners.

5.

It is nevertheless clarified that this order is issued only on the

premise that the petitioners have crossed the age of majority as seen from

the documents placed on record being their Aadhar Cards. The petitioners

have not produced on record a copy of their marriage certificate. However,

they have appended affidavits in support of their marriage and photographs

(Annexure P-3). This would not ipso facto amount to granting any seal of

approval on the legality of their marriage which essentially would come in

the domain of the concerned Matrimonial Courts. Further, they would not

be entitled for any protection against their arrest or continuance of any

criminal proceedings, if otherwise, found to be involved in commission of

any cognizable offence(s).

6.

The petition is disposed off with the above direction.