AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
33 paragraphs · 351 wordsBoth the petitioners are present in person and identified by their
counsel. They seek protection of their life and liberty by contending
that both of them having attained the age of majority, have married
each other against the wishes of their respective family member
respondent No. 4 and so seek appropriate protection from the
authorities. They submitted a representation (Annexure P-5) in this
regard to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Shaheed Bhagat
Singh Nagar on 09.10.2017, but are still apprehensive about their
security in view of the apparent inaction and alleged clout of their
family member/respondent.
Both of them do appear to have crossed the age of majority as
seen from the copies of documents filed and have married each
other, in support of which photographs (Annexures P-4) and Marriage Certificate issued by Prachin Shree Shiv Mandir, M.D.C.,
Panchkula (Annexure P-3) have been placed on record.
For the aforesaid reasons, this appears to be a fit case for this
Court to invoke the inherent powers under Section 482 of the
Cr.P.C. and in view of the mandate contained in Article 21 of the
Constitution of India to protect the citizen''s right to life and liberty.
Thus, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Shaheed Bhagat Singh
Nagar is directed to consider the representation dated 09.10.2017
(Annexure P-5) and take appropriate steps to ensure that no harm
is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners.
It is nevertheless clarified that this order is issued only on the
premise that the petitioners have crossed the age of majority as
seen from the documents placed on record being Aadhar Cards of
petitioners No.1 and 2 (Annexures P-1 and P-2). This would not
ipso facto amount to granting any seal of approval on the legality of
their marriage which essentially would come in the domain of the
concerned Matrimonial Courts. Further, they would not be entitled
for any protection against their arrest or continuance of any
criminal proceedings, if otherwise, found to be involved in
commission of any cognizable offence(s).
The petition is disposed off with the above direction.
