AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
36 paragraphs · 677 wordsS.A.Dharmadhikari, J
The applicant has filed this first application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 26.04.2021 by Police Station- Bairad, District Shivpuri (M.P.) in connection with Crime No.153/2021 registered in
relation to the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act.
According to the prosecution case, on an information given by an informer, the police reached at the spot and seized 72 bulk liters of country made
liquor from possession of the applicant, for which he did not possess any valid license. On the basis of aforesaid, crime has been registered against the
applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since 26.04.2021. Offence is
triable by JMFC. Disposal of the matter will take long time. It is further submitted that trial is held up due to COVID-19 and the applicant cannot be
kept in custody for an unlimited period without any substantial reason. It is further submitted that in view of outbreak of COVID-19, detention of the
applicant in already congested prison may be detrimental. The applicant is a permanent resident of District Shivpuri (M.P.) and there is no possibility
of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence. The applicant is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions as may be imposed by
this Court. Under these grounds, applicant prays for grant of bail.
Learned Panel Lawyer for the State opposed the application by contending that on the basis of the allegations and the material available on record, no
case for grant of bail is made out and prays for its rejection.
However, it would not be desirable to enter into the merits of the rival contentions at this juncture.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the fact that trial is not likely to conclude in near future and prolonged pre-
trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty so also considering the fact that in view of second wave of COVID-19 pandemic and with a
need to decongest the jail, which are the potential hot spots for spread of infection, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant namely â€" Dayanand
Sharma be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one local surety of the like
amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court for his appearance on the dates given by the concerned Court.
The applicant shall also furnish a written undertaking before the concerned court that he will abide by the terms and conditions of various circulars, as
well as, orders issued by the Central Government, State Government and local administration from time to time such as maintaining social distancing,
physical distancing, hygiene etc. to avoid proliferation of Corona virus.
This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-
The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him.
The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
The applicant shall not commit any other offence during pendency of the trial, failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically
without further reference to the Bench.
The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and
The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.
A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.
Certified copy as per rules.
