High CourtsSingle Bench

Madho Bagdi vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 6 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 MP CK 0036

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.A.Dharmadhikari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2), 49(A)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.22343 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

36 paragraphs · 691 words

S.A.Dharmadhikari, J

The applicant has filed this first application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on 04.04.2021 by Police Station- Sironj, District Vidisha in connection with Crime No.34/2021 registered in relation to

the offence punishable under Sections 34 (2), 49(A) of M.P. Excise Act.

According to the prosecution case, on an information given by an informer, the police reached at the spot and seized 60 bulk liters of country made

liquor from possession of the applicant, for which he did not possess any valid license. On the basis of aforesaid, crime has been registered against the

applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is aged about 35 years and has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody since

04.04.2021. Applicant has no criminal antecedent. Offence is triable by JMFC. Disposal of the matter will take long time. It is further submitted that

trial is held up due to COVID-19 and the applicant cannot be kept in custody for an unlimited period without any substantial reason. It is further

submitted that in view of outbreak of COVID-19, detention of the applicant in already congested prison may be detrimental. The applicant is a

permanent resident of District Vidisha (M.P.) and there is no possibility of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence. The applicant is

ready to abide by all the terms and conditions as may be imposed by this Court. Under these grounds, applicant prays for grant of bail.

Learned Additional Advocate General for the State opposed the application and prayed for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the

allegations and the material available on record, no case for grant of bail is made out.

However, it would not be desirable to enter into the merits of the rival contentions at this juncture.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the fact that trial is not likely to conclude in near future and prolonged pre-

trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty so also considering the fact that in view of second wave of COVID-19 pandemic and with a

need to decongest the jail, which are the potential hot spots for spread of infection, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant namely â€" Madho

Bagdi be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one local surety of the like

amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court for his appearance on the dates given by the concerned Court.

The applicant shall also furnish a written undertaking before the concerned court that he will abide by the terms and conditions of various circulars, as

well as, orders issued by the Central Government, State Government and local administration from time to time such as maintaining social distancing,

physical distancing, hygiene etc. to avoid proliferation of Corona virus.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

1.

The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him.

2.

The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3.

The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4.

The applicant shall not commit any other offence during pendency of the trial, failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically

without further reference to the Bench.

5.

The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6.

The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.

Certified copy as per rules.