AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
19 paragraphs · 288 wordsSanjeev Sachdeva, J
CM APPL.17596/2020 (exemption from certified copies) & CM APPL.17597/2020 (exemption from filing notarized affidavits and court
fee)
Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. The duly attested copy of affidavits and court fee shall be filed within one week of the
resumption of the regular functioning of the Court.
CM(M) 403/2020 & CM APPL.17595/2020 (for grant of status quo)
The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
Petitioner has filed this petition contending that an urgent application filed by the petitioner on 30.07.2020 before the Trial Court was not listed for
hearing.
It is contended that the respondent is raising unauthorised illegal construction on the plot purchased by the petitioner.
Petitioner has filed the subject suit for permanent injunction in which summons have been issued returnable for 08.10.2020.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently petitioner came to know that the respondent has started raising unauthorised
construction with haste. He approached the Trial Court, however, the urgent application filed by the petitioner in the Registry has not yet been listed.
Since the Suit of the petitioner is already pending before the Trial Court and the application was filed only on 30.07.2020, this petition is premature,
however interest of justice require that the Trial Court should expeditiously take up for consideration the urgent application filed by the petitioner on
30.07.2020.
In view of the above, this petition is disposed of directing the Trial Court to expeditiously take up for consideration the application filed by the
petitioner on 30.07.2020 and dispose of the same in accordance with law.
Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.
