High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 12 DEL CK 0023

Muhammad Ajmal vs Anjuman E Khuddam Qabristan Dargah Hazrat Khwaja Baki Billa & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 4 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous (Main) No. 609 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 382 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

CM APPLN. 31454/2020 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CM(M) 609/2020

1.

The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2.

Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 23.11.2020 whereby the Trial Court has directed the listing of the Suit for a long date.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that suit was filed as far back as on 16.02.1980 and has been pending since then. It is contended by

learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent after getting interim protection on 20.07.1982 has been delaying the progress of the suit.

4.

This is disputed by learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1/plaintiff. Learned counsel contends that the progress was delayed on account of

the fact that proceedings had been adjourned sine-die in view of the pendency of another proceedings.

5.

Without getting into the controversy and since the Suit has been pending for over 41, trial court is directed to expedite the proceedings and

endeavour to conclude the same preferably within a period of six months.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant in the Suit submits that the Suit has been listed on 19.12.2020 for a physical hearing and in view of the

present pandemic, it would not be possible to physically appear in the proceedings. He prays that the trial court be directed to take up the suit through

video conferencing.

7.

In view the advisories issued by the High Court, petitioner cannot be asked to appear physically unless the advisory is modified by the High Court,

however, recently the High Court has issued a fresh advisory that in case parties do not appear even through virtual mode even after being intimated,

the Trial Court is free to proceed in accordance with law.

8.

In view of the above, trial court is directed to take up the proceedings through video conferencing and not to list the proceedings for a physical

hearing unless all the parties consent to the same.

9.

Accordingly, list the Suit for directions before the trial court on 15.12.2020 to set up a schedule for expeditious disposal as directed.

10.

Petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.

11.

Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.