High CourtsSingle Bench

Deepo Bai vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 January 2011 · Citation: (2011) 01 P&H CK 0273

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM-M No. 36504 of 2010 (O and M)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 239 words

Alok Singh, J.—This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 180 dated 11.9.2010 under Sections 15/61/85 of NDPS Act, P.S. Sidhwan Bet, District Ludhiana.

2.

As per the version of the prosecution, on 11.9.2010, police party was going on a Govt. Jeep on patrolling duty and saw that one woman, who was sitting under a tree, started moving after seeing the police party. Police party recovered two bags from the road side in which 55 Kgs. Poppy husk was found.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has argued that nothing was recovered from the possession of the Petitioner. Even as per the FIR, Petitioner was not found sitting on the bags. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner further argued that as per the FIR, Petitioner was caught only on suspicion that the bags in question belong to her. He also argued that bags do not belong to the Petitioner and the Petitioner has nothing to do with the bags.

4.

Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has argued that bags were lying near the canal and the Petitioner was sitting under the tree near the bags and it should be presumed that the said bags were under the custody and possession of the Petitioner.

5.

Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. The Petitioner is directed to be released on bail during the trial to the satisfaction of the trial Court.