High CourtsSingle Bench

Simranjit Kaur @ Madhu vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 28 February 2011 · Citation: (2011) 3 RCR(Criminal) 92

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM M No. 2746 of 2011 (O and M)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 210 words

Alok Singh, J.—This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 69 dated 12.10.2010 u/s 18 NDPS Act, P.S. Sarai Amant Khan, District Tarn Taran.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has stated that Petitioner is in judicial custody w.e.f. 12.10.2010. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has argued that no narcotic substance was recovered from the custody or possession of the Petitioner - accused. Learned Counsel has pointed out from the FIR that as per prosecution story, Petitioner after seeing the police party has thrown away the bag on road from where narcotic substance was recovered by the police. Learned Counsel has further argued that recovery of narcotic substance from the bag lying on the road would not amount to recovery from the possession/custody of the accused. He has further argued that opium measuring 2 Kg 570 gms. is said to have recovered from the bag which is slightly more than permissible limit.

3.

Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on the instructions of SI Joga Singh states that Petitioner has no criminal history before.

4.

Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. The Petitioner is directed to be released on bail during the trial to the satisfaction of the trial Court.