High CourtsSingle Bench

Dehraram Sahu vs Bisan Bai And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 24 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 CHH CK 0351

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 — Order 39 Rule 1, Order 39 Rule 2, Order 43 Rule 1(r) · Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (227) No. 807 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 144 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

In the first appeal preferred by the petitioner / appellant, the application filed by the petitioner under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC has been

rejected by the First Appellate Court during the pendancy of the first appeal against which this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has

been preferred.

2.

Learned State counsel would take objection that miscellaneous appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the CPC would be maintainable.

3.

Since the order is appellable under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC, this writ petition is not maintainable.

4.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to prefer an appeal in accordance with law. No cost(s).

5.

Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the counsel for the petitioner on furnishing attested photocopy thereof.