High CourtsSingle Bench

Divya Singh vs Pratap Singh Thakur @ Ballu And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 6 August 2019 · Citation: (2019) 08 CHH CK 0047

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 — Order 9 Rule 9, Order 43 Rule 1(c) · Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
WP227 No. 610 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 151 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

By the impugned order dated 08/04/2019, petitioner's application under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC has been rejected by learned 14th Civil Judge, Class - II, Raipur against which this writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been preferred by her.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length.

3.

By virtue of provisions contained in Order 43 Rule 1 (c) of the CPC, a miscellaneous appeal would lie against the impugned order rejecting the application under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC filed by the petitioner. As such, this writ petition is not maintainable in law.

4.

Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. However, petitioner is at liberty to prefer an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(c) of the CPC in accordance with law.

5.

Certified copy of this order be returned after furnishing attested copy thereof.