High CourtsSingle Bench

Dhanraj vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 20 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 CHH CK 0056

HON’BLE JUDGES
Goutam Bhaduri, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164, 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 323, 354, 366A, 452, 506 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 8
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 7727 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 391 words
1.

Heard.

2.

This is the First Bail Application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been

arrested on 06.09.2021 in connection with Crime No.124/2021 registered at Police Station Saragaon, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) for the offence

punishable under Sections 452, 294, 506, 323, 354, 363, 366 (A)/34 of IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act.

3.

As per the prosecution case, on 18.08.2021 the other co-accused took the prosecutrix to celebrate her birthday thereafter one Abhishek and the

present applicant were called and they went to celebrate her birthday at certain place. After cutting the cake, the applicant tried to outrage the

modesty of the prosecutrix and put the vermilion on the forehead of the prosecutrix thereby tried to outrage the modesty of the prosecutrix.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant and the prosecutrix were in love relation which would be evident from the photographs

and the prosecutrix herself went along with the applicant and never raised any objection, therefore, the case of abduction would not be made out. He

would further submit that the applicant is in jail since 06.09.2021 and the charge-sheet in this case has been filed, therefore, the applicant may be

released on bail.

5.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail and read out the statement of the prosecutrix made under Section 164

Cr.P.C.

6.

On 02.12.2021 the prosecutrix along with her father appeared before this Court through video conferencing from DLSA, Janjgir and objected to

grant of bail to the applicant.

7.

Considering the statement made under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the photographs which are attached with this application and also taking into the

nature of allegation and the fact that the charge-sheet in this case has been filed and the period spent in jail by the applicant as he is in jail since

06.09.2021, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

8.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/-

with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by the

said Court.