High CourtsSingle Bench

Dharma & others vs State of Haryana & others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 21 November 2018 · Citation: (2018) 11 P&H CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. S. Sandhawalia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Regular First Appeal No574 of 2018 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 365 words

G.S.Sandhawalia, J.

C.M. No. 1497-CI of 2018

Application has been filed for condonation of delay of 2005 days in filing the appeal against the award dated 11.11.2011 passed by the Reference

Court, Jhajjar.

Keeping in view the law laid down by the Apex Court in Imrat Lal and others vs. Land Acquisition Collector and others, 2014 (14) SCC 133 and

Dhiraj Singh (D) through L.Rs. and others vs. Haryana State and others, 2014 (14) SCC 12,7 delay is condoned, subject to the condition that the

appellant shall not be entitled for the benefit of interest from the date of award till the date of filing of the appeal.

RFA No. 574 of 2018

The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 11.11.2011 of the Reference Court, Jhajjar, whereby, the Reference Court has

refused to grant the benefit of enhancement from Rs.16,00,000/- per acre which was awarded by the Land Acquisition Collector.

Counsels point out that the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dated 16.01.2007 was subject matter of consideration in Civil

Appeal No. 8757 of 2016, Arawali Power Company Private Ltd. vs. Joginder Singh Tokash and others decided on 05.09.2017 before the Apex Court.

The amount of compensation which was awarded by this Court i.e. Rs.29,00,400/- per acre has been reduced to Rs.25,00,000/- per acre. Relevant

portion of the same reads thus:-

“In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we find that it would be appropriate to make approximately 15% deduction towards

development and in the facts and circumstances of the case, we grant compensation at the rate of Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees twenty five lakhs only) per

acre alongwith statutory benefits. Consequently the appeals filed by the Company are partly allowed and the cross appeals/cross objections preferred

by the owners are hereby dismissed. No costs.â€​

Accordingly, keeping in view the said facts and to maintain parity, the present appeal is also allowed and the appellant is held entitled for the said

amount i.e. Rs.25,00,000/- per acre alongwith all statutory benefits. However, the applicants-appellant shall not be entitled for the benefit of interest on

the enhanced compensation for the period of delay in filing the appeal i.e. 2005 days.