High CourtsSingle Bench

Sat Pal and others vs State of Haryana and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 P&H CK 0104

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.S. Sandhawalia, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
RFA No.1006 of 2018 (O&M)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

36 paragraphs · 571 words

G.S. Sandhawalia , J. (Oral)

CM-2638-CI-2018

Application is allowed, as prayed for.

CM stands disposed of.

CM-2636-CI-2018

Application under Section 151 CPC has been filed for listing the appeal in urgent as the matter is covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in Civil

Appeal Nos.13132-13141 of 2017 'Manoj Kumar and others Vs. State of Haryana and others' decided on 13.09.2017 (Annexure A-1), wherein for the

notification dated 30.05.2005, the market value of the land had been assessed @ `95 lakhs per acre.

Accordingly, keeping in view of the averments made in the application and in view of the fact that matter is covered by the said judgment, the same is

allowed.

CM stands disposed of.

CM-2637-CI-2018

Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 1423 days in filing the present appeal has been filed.

Notice of the application.

Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. Copy has been supplied to him.

Accordingly, keeping in view the averments made in the application and in view of the fact that the interest of the State can be protected by denying

the appellant the benefit of interest for 1423 days in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in 'Imrat Lal and others Vs. Land Acquisition

Collector and others' 2014 (14) SCC 133 and in 'Dhiraj Singh (D) through LRs. and others Vs. Haryana State and others' 2015 (1) SCC (Civil) 236,

the application is allowed.

The delay of 1423 days in filing the appeal is condoned, with the condition that the appellant shall not be entitled for interest on the enhanced

compensation.

CM stands disposed of.

Main appeal

The Land Acquisition Collector had awarded compensation @ Rs.24 lakh per acre for the prime land, Rs.20 lakhs per acre for the area within

municipal limits and Rs.10 lakhs per acre for the remaining land. The Reference Court vide Award dated 10.02.2014 fixed the market value @

Rs.1,560/- per square meter at a uniform rate, which was initially enhanced by this Court @ `3,610/- per square meter in RFA No.3860 of 2014

'Ajmer Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others' decided on 24.02.2016, which would taken the market value to `1,46,09,000/- per acre. The

said amount has now been modified in the case of Manoj Kumar (supra) to `95 lakhs per acre, which would be apparent from as under:-

“32. Even if we calculate compensation by adding between 12 to 13% flat increase, taking base price at Rs.1560/- granted in the case of Swaran

Singh in the facts of the case, the price would come approximately to Rs.1.10 crores per acre. Further deduction in addition to deduction made in

Swaran Singh’s case (supra) is required to be made towards development, it would be appropriate to deduct further amount of Rs.15 lakhs. Thus

the compensation that we award comes to Rs.95 lakhs per acre, not Rs.1,46,09,000/- as determined by the High Court. Approximation of

compensation, when made on comparable sale method, would by and large be similar. We reduce the amount awarded by the High Court. Thus, we

deem it appropriate to award the amount @ Rs.95 lakhs per acre along with statutory benefits.â€​

Accordingly, the present appeal is allowed in the same terms. It is, however, made clear that the appellant shall not be entitled for interest on the

enhanced compensation for the delay period of 1423 days.