High CourtsSingle Bench

Digraj vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 12 September 2024 · Citation: (2024) 09 UK CK 0106

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 363, 366, 376 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 5, 6
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1732 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 159 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.443 of 2023, under Sections 363, 366 and 376 IPC and Section 5/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station- Jaspur, District- Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the victim has not supported the prosecution case at trial; there is no forensic evidence against the applicant.

4.

Learned State Counsel admits these facts.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.