AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
31 paragraphs · 350 wordsPresent petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of
regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 146 dated 15.5.2009, under Sections
302 and 34 IPC and Section 25(54) of Arms Act, registered at Police Station
Kundli, District Sonepat. The allegation against the petitioner is that he
along with his co-accused allegedly committed murder of Pardeep.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that 2 eye
witnesses of the prosecution, namely; Sunil son of Balwan and Mukesh son
of Rajinder, have already been examined before the learned trial Judge and
have not supported the prosecution case rather turned hostile. Apart from
that, all the main witnesses of the case, have been examined, who have not
supported the prosecution case. The petitioner is in custody since
18.11.2015 and trial of the case still to take some more time, so, he be
released on bail.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Sukhbir,
contended that out of 23 prosecution witnesses, 15 have already been
examined and they have not implicated the present petitioner. It is not a
case of use of fire arm by the petitioner nor any such recovery of weapon
was effected from him.
Taking into consideration all these facts and the fact that
remaining co-accused, namely; Monu and Rambir were convicted and
sentenced on 24.4.2015 in a separate trial, as there was evidence against
them, but in the present case, despite the fact that all the material witnesses
have been examined before the learned trial Judge, there is nothing to
implicate the present petitioner. However, without expressing anything on
merits of this case, least that may not prejudice rights of either of the parties
and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2015; the trial of the
case still to take some more time and no useful purpose would be served by
detaining the petitioner behind the bars, the present petitioner is ordered to
be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the
satisfaction of the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate.
The present petition stands disposed of.
