High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Sandeep @ Pahal vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 September 2017 · Citation: (2017) 09 P&H CK 0045

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ramendra Jain
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=3863>Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973</a>, <a href=3863-439>Section 439</a> - Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail · <a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-120B>Section 120B</a>, <a href=1767-34>
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
23225-2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 158 words
1.

Through this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., prayer has

been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case First Information

Report No.22 dated 02.02.2016 under Sections 120-B / 307 / 34 IPC and

Section 25 / 54 / 59 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Barauda,

District Sonepat.

2.

The allegations against the petitioner are that on the instruction

of the petitioner, co-accused Sonu and Sandeep alias Bandu fired upon the

complainant.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter-alia contends that as per

the prosecution story, the petitioner was not present at the spot. He has been

falsely implicated. All the material witnesses have already been examined.

4.

Considering the over all circumstances, but without

commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petitioner is granted

regular bail, during the trial, subject to his furnishing bail/ surety bonds to

the satisfaction of the trial Court.

5.

The petition is, accordingly, allowed.