AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 131 wordsSandeep Sharma, J
Learned counsel representing the petitioner on instructions states that the petitioner would be content/satisfied in case representation, dated 18.11.2014 (Annexure A7) having been filed by the petitioner, is ordered to be decided by the respondents in time bound manner.
Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
No other point urged.
Consequently, in view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Director of Higher Education, Government of Himachal Pradesh (respondent No.2) to consider and decide petitioner's representation (Annexure A7), in accordance with law, by affording due opportunity of hearing/representation to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
