CourtKutchehry.com
High CourtsDivision Bench

Vinod Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 23 April 2021 · Citation: (2021) 04 SHI CK 0214

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sureshwar Thakur, J · Sandeep Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 2546 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 125 words

Sandeep Sharma, J

1.

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions states that his client shall be content and satisfied in case respondents are directing to decide the pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-5), in a time bound manner.

2.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General is not averse to the aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.

3.

Consequently, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation made by the petitioner (Annexure P-5) within four weeks from today. Needless to say, due opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the petitioner and a speaking order shall be passed thereafter.

Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms, alongwith all pending applications.

Copy Dasti.